| Add You |
Hubs | Hubbers | Topics | Request |
| #1 in Business | Subscribe Email Print |
|
You are here: Home > Internet and Businesses Online > Web Design > Accessibility Audit vs. Accessibility Testing |
|
Add You - Accessibility Audit vs. Accessibility Testing
Domain Names: Simple Rules for Choosing Smart Names on investment for most organisations. It's unlikely to highlight any major accessibility issues that don't come out of the accessibility audit (provided that the audit is carried out by an accessibility expert).It is not true that all of the good domain names are taken. You may still be able to register your name, your business name, or another catchy URL.Here are some tips for choosing a domain name:Keep it short and simple. Long URLs are hard to remember, and people are more likely to make errors when keying them in.Include keywords in your domain name. Search engines may reward you with better placement in search results when the keywords are in your URL.Whenever possible, go for the .com. Many people automatically assume that Web site URLs end in .com, and they do not correctly remember other extensions, such as .net or .info.Try to avoid abbreviations and special characters in your domain name. gdbizcents.com would be very hard to give out without spelling it, and people won't intuitively remember or guess it. Are we really recommending to not do accessibility testing then? Well mostly, yes. Accessibility is far more guideline-driven than usability so accessibility solutions can easily be transferred from one website to the next. Provided that some organisations continue to carry out accessibility testing, you can 'piggy-back' off the knowledge that they've gained. By employing an accessibility expert to carry out an accessibility audit you'll quite quickly have this 'real-world' accessibility knowledge applied to your website. If you do wish to carry out accessibility testing then it should only take place after the findings from an accessibility audit have been implemented. There's no point in conducting the accessibility tests if users fall down straightaway on basic accessibility issues that would have been highlighted in the audit. In reality though, you often only need to conduct accessibility testing if you want your web team to learn about accessibility and gain buy-in into it. Accessibility testing can also be useful if you wish to What Is In Your Marketing Tool Box and Are Those Tools Delivering You Sharp Sales? There are currently three different options available to you when testing a website for accessibility:If you are a small business owner, your biggest problem, simply speaking, is growing your bottom line by getting more customers. To secure new customers requires that you share or deliver your message to the market place. If you don’t believe that marketing is essential to your business, then don’t read any further because this article will have no value for you.However, if you understand the importance of marketing, maybe now is the time to check out your marketing tool box and assess your marketing tools to ensure that they will deliver you sharp sales in 2006.Your marketing tool box much like a traditional tool box and has 2 sections. The top section sits on top of the bottom section. Within the second section of your tool box or the bottom is the “heavier” marketing tools. Remember, each tool has a cost. NOTE: An estimated price - Accessibility audit - An accessibility expert reviews your site, highlighting any accessibility issue - Accessibility testing - Real disabled users complete common tasks on your website whilst a moderator notes all problems they experience - Automated accessibility testing - An automated program evaluates your website against accessibility guidelines Accessibility audit An accessibility audit involves an accessibility expert reviewing your site, highlighting all accessibility issues and providing recommendations for fixing them. The reviewer would typically use assistive software used by disabled web users (e.g. a screen reader) to effectively carry out the audit, along with the Web Accessibility Toolbar. You could hire an external accessibility consultancy to do this, but it's also possible to conduct the audit in-house. By reading through the W3C accessibility guidelines and attending a web accessibility training course (the latter to learn 'real-world' accessibility) you can gain a base level of accessibility knowledge. You should then be able to get your website up to a reasonable level of accessibility. The main benefit of using an accessibility audit to evaluate your website is that accessibility audits are significantly cheaper and quicker than accessibility testing. Accessibility audits are often more comprehensive than accessibility testing in their depth and breadth of recommendations. The main disadvantage of accessibility audits is that they're not designed for knowledge transfer. As such, your web team won't gain a great understanding of web accessibility nor are they likely to get much extra buy-in into accessibility. Both of these can be remedied through effective accessibility training. Accessibility testing There are a number of organisations in the accessibility world that swear by accessibility testing. The Disability Rights Commission, for example, have consistently said that testing a website with real disabled users is the only way to ensure it offers optimum accessibility. Their formal investigation into the accessibility of 1000 websites and the PAS 78 document they spearheaded both very strongly state that accessibility testing is the way to uncover all accessibility issues. The main benefits of conducting accessibility testing include: - You'll uncover website usability issues too As accessibility testing involves testing your website with real people, you'll get the side benefit of uncovering website usability issues too. If however you're going to invest the time and money involved in conducing accessibility testing then you might as well just carry out regular usability testing. Regular usability testing will uncover more usability issues as disabled users tend to take longer to complete tasks so carry out fewer tasks in a testing session. - It's a great learning experience for your web team Running accessibility testing sessions, particularly if you're able to watch them live, is a great learning experience for everyone involved. There's nothing more eye opening than watching real users with real disabilities attempt to use your site. Accessibility testing is also a great way of getting the web team to get buy-in into accessibility. There are also some disadvantages of using accessibility testing as a way of evaluating your website's accessibility: - It's extremely expensive to do properly In order to carry out statistically valid accessibility testing you'll need to test with at least 5-6 users per user group. This means testing with 5-6 screen reader users, 5-6 screen magnifier users, 5-6 motor impaired users, 5-6 users with learning difficulties etc. Within these groups there are sub-groups (for example, there are different types of motor impairments) so to do proper accessibility testing you'll have to test with around 30 users. - It'll find fewer problems than an accessibility audit Surprisingly, accessibility testing actually brings up fewer problems (and therefore fewer recommendations) than an accessibility audit. This is basically because real users often don't realise when a problem or nuisance occurs so don't voice their annoyance. For example, vertical bars are often used to separate horizontal navigation links, with each vertical bar being announced to screen reader users as “vertical bar”. Screen reader users are unlikely to comment or complain about this as they probably won't know what a 'vertical bar' is. An accessibility audit would however point this out as a problem and offer the solution (the solution would be to remove the vertical bars and insert them as right borders (through the CSS) on to the links). Which accessibility evaluation technique should you use? Generally speaking, it's not necessary to conduct accessibility testing most of the time. To conduct accessibility testing properly is extremely expensive and simply not worth the return on investment for most organisations. It's unlikely to highlight any major accessibility issues that don't come out of the accessibility audit (provided that the audit is carried out by an accessibility expert). Are we really recommending to not do accessibility testing then? Well mostly, yes. Accessibility is far more guideline-driven than usability so accessibility solutions can easily be transferred from one website to the next. Provided that some organisations continue to carry out accessibility testing, you can 'piggy-back' off the knowledge that they've gained. By employing an accessibility expert to carry out an accessibility audit you'll quite quickly have this 'real-world' accessibility knowledge applied to your website. If you do wish to carry out accessibility testing then it should only take place after the findings from an accessibility audit have been implemented. There's no point in conducting the accessibility tests if users fall down straightaway on basic accessibility issues that would have been highlighted in the audit. In reality though, you often only need to conduct accessibility testing if you want your web team to learn about accessibility and gain buy-in into it. Accessibility testing can also be useful if you wish to Building a Logo benefit of using an accessibility audit to evaluate your website is that accessibility audits are significantly cheaper and quicker than accessibility testing. Accessibility audits are often more comprehensive than accessibility testing in their depth and breadth of recommendations.All businesses have to have some sort or other logo of their own. This logo is the media wherein they introduce themselves to their clients. It is a known fact that visual processing is a very important way of gathering information as a good design is always remembered for ages. Keeping this in mind, most of the multinational companies spend millions of dollars on the development of their logo and any other branding material they need.There are some logo design tips that ensure that the logo design becomes a successful logo for your business. Have you ever noted that most of the greatest logos around are simple? This is because it is then easier to remember and recognize a simple logo than to identify a complicated logo design. The typeface of the logo design too makes a lot of difference in the success of the logo. Make your logo design using vector graphics as these g The main disadvantage of accessibility audits is that they're not designed for knowledge transfer. As such, your web team won't gain a great understanding of web accessibility nor are they likely to get much extra buy-in into accessibility. Both of these can be remedied through effective accessibility training. Accessibility testing There are a number of organisations in the accessibility world that swear by accessibility testing. The Disability Rights Commission, for example, have consistently said that testing a website with real disabled users is the only way to ensure it offers optimum accessibility. Their formal investigation into the accessibility of 1000 websites and the PAS 78 document they spearheaded both very strongly state that accessibility testing is the way to uncover all accessibility issues. The main benefits of conducting accessibility testing include: - You'll uncover website usability issues too As accessibility testing involves testing your website with real people, you'll get the side benefit of uncovering website usability issues too. If however you're going to invest the time and money involved in conducing accessibility testing then you might as well just carry out regular usability testing. Regular usability testing will uncover more usability issues as disabled users tend to take longer to complete tasks so carry out fewer tasks in a testing session. - It's a great learning experience for your web team Running accessibility testing sessions, particularly if you're able to watch them live, is a great learning experience for everyone involved. There's nothing more eye opening than watching real users with real disabilities attempt to use your site. Accessibility testing is also a great way of getting the web team to get buy-in into accessibility. There are also some disadvantages of using accessibility testing as a way of evaluating your website's accessibility: - It's extremely expensive to do properly In order to carry out statistically valid accessibility testing you'll need to test with at least 5-6 users per user group. This means testing with 5-6 screen reader users, 5-6 screen magnifier users, 5-6 motor impaired users, 5-6 users with learning difficulties etc. Within these groups there are sub-groups (for example, there are different types of motor impairments) so to do proper accessibility testing you'll have to test with around 30 users. - It'll find fewer problems than an accessibility audit Surprisingly, accessibility testing actually brings up fewer problems (and therefore fewer recommendations) than an accessibility audit. This is basically because real users often don't realise when a problem or nuisance occurs so don't voice their annoyance. For example, vertical bars are often used to separate horizontal navigation links, with each vertical bar being announced to screen reader users as “vertical bar”. Screen reader users are unlikely to comment or complain about this as they probably won't know what a 'vertical bar' is. An accessibility audit would however point this out as a problem and offer the solution (the solution would be to remove the vertical bars and insert them as right borders (through the CSS) on to the links). Which accessibility evaluation technique should you use? Generally speaking, it's not necessary to conduct accessibility testing most of the time. To conduct accessibility testing properly is extremely expensive and simply not worth the return on investment for most organisations. It's unlikely to highlight any major accessibility issues that don't come out of the accessibility audit (provided that the audit is carried out by an accessibility expert). Are we really recommending to not do accessibility testing then? Well mostly, yes. Accessibility is far more guideline-driven than usability so accessibility solutions can easily be transferred from one website to the next. Provided that some organisations continue to carry out accessibility testing, you can 'piggy-back' off the knowledge that they've gained. By employing an accessibility expert to carry out an accessibility audit you'll quite quickly have this 'real-world' accessibility knowledge applied to your website. If you do wish to carry out accessibility testing then it should only take place after the findings from an accessibility audit have been implemented. There's no point in conducting the accessibility tests if users fall down straightaway on basic accessibility issues that would have been highlighted in the audit. In reality though, you often only need to conduct accessibility testing if you want your web team to learn about accessibility and gain buy-in into it. Accessibility testing can also be useful if you wish to Turning Objections Into Sales testing your website with real people, you'll get the side benefit of uncovering website usability issues too. If however you're going to invest the time and money involved in conducing accessibility testing then you might as well just carry out regular usability testing. Regular usability testing will uncover more usability issues as disabled users tend to take longer to complete tasks so carry out fewer tasks in a testing session.When you become a Master Persuader, you will learn to love objections. You will come to understand that when people voice their objections, it actually indicates interest and shows that they are paying attention to what you are saying. The key to persuasion is anticipating all objections before you hear them. Fielding questions and handling objections can make or break you as a persuader. Such skills will help you in every aspect of your life.Four different times to handle objections:1. Before they occur 2. When they occur 3. Later 4. NeverReal Objections Vs False ObjectionsYou have to be able to weed real objections from false objections. People are nice and sometimes won't tell you the truth. Most people won't say "I cant afford it."1. The first thing is to find out if - It's a great learning experience for your web team Running accessibility testing sessions, particularly if you're able to watch them live, is a great learning experience for everyone involved. There's nothing more eye opening than watching real users with real disabilities attempt to use your site. Accessibility testing is also a great way of getting the web team to get buy-in into accessibility. There are also some disadvantages of using accessibility testing as a way of evaluating your website's accessibility: - It's extremely expensive to do properly In order to carry out statistically valid accessibility testing you'll need to test with at least 5-6 users per user group. This means testing with 5-6 screen reader users, 5-6 screen magnifier users, 5-6 motor impaired users, 5-6 users with learning difficulties etc. Within these groups there are sub-groups (for example, there are different types of motor impairments) so to do proper accessibility testing you'll have to test with around 30 users. - It'll find fewer problems than an accessibility audit Surprisingly, accessibility testing actually brings up fewer problems (and therefore fewer recommendations) than an accessibility audit. This is basically because real users often don't realise when a problem or nuisance occurs so don't voice their annoyance. For example, vertical bars are often used to separate horizontal navigation links, with each vertical bar being announced to screen reader users as “vertical bar”. Screen reader users are unlikely to comment or complain about this as they probably won't know what a 'vertical bar' is. An accessibility audit would however point this out as a problem and offer the solution (the solution would be to remove the vertical bars and insert them as right borders (through the CSS) on to the links). Which accessibility evaluation technique should you use? Generally speaking, it's not necessary to conduct accessibility testing most of the time. To conduct accessibility testing properly is extremely expensive and simply not worth the return on investment for most organisations. It's unlikely to highlight any major accessibility issues that don't come out of the accessibility audit (provided that the audit is carried out by an accessibility expert). Are we really recommending to not do accessibility testing then? Well mostly, yes. Accessibility is far more guideline-driven than usability so accessibility solutions can easily be transferred from one website to the next. Provided that some organisations continue to carry out accessibility testing, you can 'piggy-back' off the knowledge that they've gained. By employing an accessibility expert to carry out an accessibility audit you'll quite quickly have this 'real-world' accessibility knowledge applied to your website. If you do wish to carry out accessibility testing then it should only take place after the findings from an accessibility audit have been implemented. There's no point in conducting the accessibility tests if users fall down straightaway on basic accessibility issues that would have been highlighted in the audit. In reality though, you often only need to conduct accessibility testing if you want your web team to learn about accessibility and gain buy-in into it. Accessibility testing can also be useful if you wish to Mattress Cleaning Business: How To Manual ifficulties etc. Within these groups there are sub-groups (for example, there are different types of motor impairments) so to do proper accessibility testing you'll have to test with around 30 users.A Mattress Cleaning Business might be just for you if you have tried everything to contain your allergies, but feel like it is not enough. Instead of just purchasing the equipment to rid your fabric furniture and mattresses of allergens, you can also help others in your community to feel the relief and make a good income at the same time.Mattress cleaning companies have been available for approximately 12 years in Europe, and are just now starting up in the United States. No matter where you live, this business has virtually no competition, and is useful to all people. If you think it is very expensive to start, you’re wrong.You can find mattress cleaning service franchises or companies wanting to set up dealers. You will purchase a franchise or license, and start your business. Either way the companies include the equipment, training, support and marketing to - It'll find fewer problems than an accessibility audit Surprisingly, accessibility testing actually brings up fewer problems (and therefore fewer recommendations) than an accessibility audit. This is basically because real users often don't realise when a problem or nuisance occurs so don't voice their annoyance. For example, vertical bars are often used to separate horizontal navigation links, with each vertical bar being announced to screen reader users as “vertical bar”. Screen reader users are unlikely to comment or complain about this as they probably won't know what a 'vertical bar' is. An accessibility audit would however point this out as a problem and offer the solution (the solution would be to remove the vertical bars and insert them as right borders (through the CSS) on to the links). Which accessibility evaluation technique should you use? Generally speaking, it's not necessary to conduct accessibility testing most of the time. To conduct accessibility testing properly is extremely expensive and simply not worth the return on investment for most organisations. It's unlikely to highlight any major accessibility issues that don't come out of the accessibility audit (provided that the audit is carried out by an accessibility expert). Are we really recommending to not do accessibility testing then? Well mostly, yes. Accessibility is far more guideline-driven than usability so accessibility solutions can easily be transferred from one website to the next. Provided that some organisations continue to carry out accessibility testing, you can 'piggy-back' off the knowledge that they've gained. By employing an accessibility expert to carry out an accessibility audit you'll quite quickly have this 'real-world' accessibility knowledge applied to your website. If you do wish to carry out accessibility testing then it should only take place after the findings from an accessibility audit have been implemented. There's no point in conducting the accessibility tests if users fall down straightaway on basic accessibility issues that would have been highlighted in the audit. In reality though, you often only need to conduct accessibility testing if you want your web team to learn about accessibility and gain buy-in into it. Accessibility testing can also be useful if you wish to Internet Marketing is Growing like Weeds on investment for most organisations. It's unlikely to highlight any major accessibility issues that don't come out of the accessibility audit (provided that the audit is carried out by an accessibility expert).The Internet is growing so fast. Are you growing with it. Are you trying to sell something on the Internet? The numbers are growing daily. It is getting harder and harder just to market to the whole net. It has become so large that now you really need to concentrate in your niche area. Actually you probably were just wasting your time, effort and money if you were just shooting out into the crowd. If you listen or have heard anyone in the know about advertising they speak about a targeted group or market.We want the 15 to 25 or the 18 to 35. Or they want the middle aged white male. These are targeted groups. But there is another area that smart marketers use. It is call a targeted niche. I niche is a group that are interested in a specific area or field or even product. So besides thinking about your targeted group you should also consider what your niche group is. Are we really recommending to not do accessibility testing then? Well mostly, yes. Accessibility is far more guideline-driven than usability so accessibility solutions can easily be transferred from one website to the next. Provided that some organisations continue to carry out accessibility testing, you can 'piggy-back' off the knowledge that they've gained. By employing an accessibility expert to carry out an accessibility audit you'll quite quickly have this 'real-world' accessibility knowledge applied to your website. If you do wish to carry out accessibility testing then it should only take place after the findings from an accessibility audit have been implemented. There's no point in conducting the accessibility tests if users fall down straightaway on basic accessibility issues that would have been highlighted in the audit. In reality though, you often only need to conduct accessibility testing if you want your web team to learn about accessibility and gain buy-in into it. Accessibility testing can also be useful if you wish to test complex interactions (e.g. Flash, complex JavaScript) that can sometimes fall beyond the scope of an accessibility audit. But what about automated accessibility testing tools? Generally speaking, automated accessibility testing tools are very limited in being able to uncover real problems. They can't adequately check for the majority of accessibility guidelines and can sometimes report problems that aren't actually problems. The only real benefit of using an automated testing tool is to get a top level feel of how accessible (or inaccessible) your website is. In terms of getting real recommendations for fixing real problems then an accessibility audit is vastly superior.
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
Related Articles:Baby Boomers - You Need to Write Your Business and Professional Memoir Affiliate Marketing: Putting Your Name On the Line
|