Top 5 Reasons Why You Need a Publicist
1. You need exposure.In order to sell something, the public needs to know about it.You have something that you are certain that the rest of the public needs to know about and there is no better way to spread the word about you or your product than with public relations. The amount of encouraging attention that a magazine interview or news article gets cannot compare to that of an advertisement. There is an extra sense of authority when people hear about something from a TV show or radio show. It is notably influential. Although both ads and PR are effective and necessary to properly market you or your product, you really cannot do with public relations.up the reserves needed to counter-balance the DXG in circulation. Everything above that leads to sheer profits that can be withdrawn, without having to cause a slowdown in the process). The idea here is to gauge what each DXUser is capable of doing to take part in re-creating system fluidity. From that point, marketing can easily take over to develop what for current DXUsers represents ‘withdraw-able gains.’

Very well. There is a back-log. Processing through it is done by bringing in fresh funds. Doing that is based on what current members add (remember, the REASON we are paid is to middle-man reserves for the system, so that the rest of

Getting upto Speed

In this issue, we’re going to talk about something quite productive:

What does it take to get back to system operations?

Here is where we indicated earlier that for us (DXPT), this is not a new scenario.

For us, this has happened before; actually on several occasions: 5, actually. There have been 5 slowdowns during the time that DXPT has been involved in this system. Each one lasted for a period of around a few weeks to a few months.

The answer is not complex

When we started, we had a 9-month slowdown to face, with perhaps 60,000 OutXchanges for various amounts that needed to be cashed out before we were able to operate at basic saturation levels. Being able to maintain the ‘saturation’… that was something that came and went over time, as DXInOne evolved. It’s just a matter of having to keep up with system standards and moving forward with them.

On the whole, the answer is simple: getting OutXchanges back up to speed means being able to raise enough reserves to do so, system-wide. This means being able to add enough EG, EB, various bank account amounts, etc.

So, is that as hard for us to do as in the ‘old’ days? After all, we are a lot bigger now, and more individuals can be expected to take their funds and leave. How tough is clearing the back-log going to be, so that we can get going again…?

To answer that, let’s use some numbers. We will invent the numbers; you can tweak as you will. The point is to understand the principal, and fine-tune as you go along.

What you have to think about

a) There is an OutXchange queue currently. It requires reserves being added to process through, so that we can get back to fluid levels. By processing the ‘back-log,’ we bring the OutX burden to only what is applied currently. So, we can then view what it ‘currently’ takes for system reserves to process through.

b) There is a certain number of DXUsers who are involved, each of whom probably has OutXchanges listed. These are the individuals who are able to affect the system fluidity, and are able to list OutXchanges. This is our ‘terra prima’: in effect, those who are capable of moving the system or leaving it stagnant, or whatever arrangement DXInOne affords us as we move along. Whatever DXInOne suggests forms the model that we are able work with.

c) There is a need to create an ongoing, sustainable amount of reserves added monthly (fresh funds, to build up the reserves needed to counter-balance the DXG in circulation. Everything above that leads to sheer profits that can be withdrawn, without having to cause a slowdown in the process). The idea here is to gauge what each DXUser is capable of doing to take part in re-creating system fluidity. From that point, marketing can easily take over to develop what for current DXUsers represents ‘withdraw-able gains.’

Very well. There is a back-log. Processing through it is done by bringing in fresh funds. Doing that is based on what current members add (remember, the REASON we are paid is to middle-man reserves for the system, so that the rest of t

Xchanges for various amounts that needed to be cashed out before we were able to operate at basic saturation levels. Being able to maintain the ‘saturation’… that was something that came and went over time, as DXInOne evolved. It’s just a matter of having to keep up with system standards and moving forward with them.

On the whole, the answer is simple: getting OutXchanges back up to speed means being able to raise enough reserves to do so, system-wide. This means being able to add enough EG, EB, various bank account amounts, etc.

So, is that as hard for us to do as in the ‘old’ days? After all, we are a lot bigger now, and more individuals can be expected to take their funds and leave. How tough is clearing the back-log going to be, so that we can get going again…?

To answer that, let’s use some numbers. We will invent the numbers; you can tweak as you will. The point is to understand the principal, and fine-tune as you go along.

What you have to think about

a) There is an OutXchange queue currently. It requires reserves being added to process through, so that we can get back to fluid levels. By processing the ‘back-log,’ we bring the OutX burden to only what is applied currently. So, we can then view what it ‘currently’ takes for system reserves to process through.

b) There is a certain number of DXUsers who are involved, each of whom probably has OutXchanges listed. These are the individuals who are able to affect the system fluidity, and are able to list OutXchanges. This is our ‘terra prima’: in effect, those who are capable of moving the system or leaving it stagnant, or whatever arrangement DXInOne affords us as we move along. Whatever DXInOne suggests forms the model that we are able work with.

c) There is a need to create an ongoing, sustainable amount of reserves added monthly (fresh funds, to build up the reserves needed to counter-balance the DXG in circulation. Everything above that leads to sheer profits that can be withdrawn, without having to cause a slowdown in the process). The idea here is to gauge what each DXUser is capable of doing to take part in re-creating system fluidity. From that point, marketing can easily take over to develop what for current DXUsers represents ‘withdraw-able gains.’

Very well. There is a back-log. Processing through it is done by bringing in fresh funds. Doing that is based on what current members add (remember, the REASON we are paid is to middle-man reserves for the system, so that the rest of

viduals can be expected to take their funds and leave. How tough is clearing the back-log going to be, so that we can get going again…?

To answer that, let’s use some numbers. We will invent the numbers; you can tweak as you will. The point is to understand the principal, and fine-tune as you go along.

What you have to think about

a) There is an OutXchange queue currently. It requires reserves being added to process through, so that we can get back to fluid levels. By processing the ‘back-log,’ we bring the OutX burden to only what is applied currently. So, we can then view what it ‘currently’ takes for system reserves to process through.

b) There is a certain number of DXUsers who are involved, each of whom probably has OutXchanges listed. These are the individuals who are able to affect the system fluidity, and are able to list OutXchanges. This is our ‘terra prima’: in effect, those who are capable of moving the system or leaving it stagnant, or whatever arrangement DXInOne affords us as we move along. Whatever DXInOne suggests forms the model that we are able work with.

c) There is a need to create an ongoing, sustainable amount of reserves added monthly (fresh funds, to build up the reserves needed to counter-balance the DXG in circulation. Everything above that leads to sheer profits that can be withdrawn, without having to cause a slowdown in the process). The idea here is to gauge what each DXUser is capable of doing to take part in re-creating system fluidity. From that point, marketing can easily take over to develop what for current DXUsers represents ‘withdraw-able gains.’

Very well. There is a back-log. Processing through it is done by bringing in fresh funds. Doing that is based on what current members add (remember, the REASON we are paid is to middle-man reserves for the system, so that the rest of

ently’ takes for system reserves to process through.

b) There is a certain number of DXUsers who are involved, each of whom probably has OutXchanges listed. These are the individuals who are able to affect the system fluidity, and are able to list OutXchanges. This is our ‘terra prima’: in effect, those who are capable of moving the system or leaving it stagnant, or whatever arrangement DXInOne affords us as we move along. Whatever DXInOne suggests forms the model that we are able work with.

c) There is a need to create an ongoing, sustainable amount of reserves added monthly (fresh funds, to build up the reserves needed to counter-balance the DXG in circulation. Everything above that leads to sheer profits that can be withdrawn, without having to cause a slowdown in the process). The idea here is to gauge what each DXUser is capable of doing to take part in re-creating system fluidity. From that point, marketing can easily take over to develop what for current DXUsers represents ‘withdraw-able gains.’

Very well. There is a back-log. Processing through it is done by bringing in fresh funds. Doing that is based on what current members add (remember, the REASON we are paid is to middle-man reserves for the system, so that the rest of

up the reserves needed to counter-balance the DXG in circulation. Everything above that leads to sheer profits that can be withdrawn, without having to cause a slowdown in the process). The idea here is to gauge what each DXUser is capable of doing to take part in re-creating system fluidity. From that point, marketing can easily take over to develop what for current DXUsers represents ‘withdraw-able gains.’

Very well. There is a back-log. Processing through it is done by bringing in fresh funds. Doing that is based on what current members add (remember, the REASON we are paid is to middle-man reserves for the system, so that the rest of the DXServices become valuable to new DXInOne entrants).

Getting back on track

Let’s look at some numbers, to get an idea of what it takes to get back on track (to get OutX speeds back to near overnight levels at whatever amount per OutX):

Assume there is $20,000,000 in OutX queue.

Assume there are 50,000 DXUsers.

Assume each pays an average $50/month in discount OA/DXD fees.

50,000 * $50/month is $2,500,000 per month in fresh funds (entirely aside from upcoming DXC release).

Assume that each $ makes 3 round-trips through the system on average, before being used up between withdrawals and fees.

Then, we have $7,500,000 worth of OutX's that can be processed each month from fresh funds... more to follow the next month. And withdrawals being possible along the way.

It only takes 3-4 months at this rate to clear the backlog. Beyond that we have gains, but those gains are easily controlled by marketing efforts. This is because by clearing the back-log and setting the stage for fluidity, marketing is able to dive back in, and get the job of DXInOne market expansion done.

So, without looking at ANY other variables outside of paying OA/DXD fees from IB and letting marketing do its job, there is NO ISSUE to getting back on-track with system fluidity.

Again, this is NOT ANYTHING NEW. This is not a ‘new standard’ which is being required of members; this is a VERY OLD standard that made the system move quite well!

That standard was changed in 2005, due to system programming issues and some other things, but is FINALLY able to be re-instated. In short – DXInOne can finally get the standards re-instated, and this means that we can finally count on those internal factors to work for us again.

That recreated fluidity, which makes it possible for the system to get back to standards we want: up to overnight OutXchanges, again and again!

In the next topic, we’ll speak of the thing that has been next on the list of questions:

“Are we assured of getting back on-track? That is, will we see the issues that caused the slowdown reappear again?”