DXInOne knew well that many who had gotten involved were not going to understand where the system was going if the changes that NEEDED to be made were put into place ALL OF A SUDDEN.

So, DXInOne focused on incremental changes, trying to shepherd everyone along. This ‘slow, incremental changes mode’ was possible for one main reason: DXInOne was not ready to launch anyway. They could let us be ‘amateurish’ about the way we handled our accounts. They could let us make mistakes, try to straighten out, get it wrong, etc… which is good for the reason that it DOES teach us to think about the system as the middle-men we need to become for it!

BUT, lately, the changes have just started to get BIG, SUDDEN, and STRICT.

What is happening?

DXInOne is getting very close to a full DXSystem release! I For that to happen, we have to quit being ‘amateurish’ market makers, and start acting like a competitive system!

To put it another way, DXInOne is saying ‘ok; it’s time to quit dabbling. We have given as much leverage as possible for as long

At this time, we are finished with the basic ‘history’ concerning what has unfolded, and where it has led, and why things have come to be the way they are currently.

Moving forward, we are going to be very progressive!!

We will be speaking about what to expect in terms of OutXchange cycles as well as what to expect with regards to who will profit, and how much, and why!

You have learned much about what caused the slowdown, what it means, and what it generally takes to fix. You have learned WHY it was allowed, and where we are going next.

Moving Forward

The title of this issue is a typical question that appears when folks have generally understood what we have discussed in the previous issues:

“Are we assured of getting back on-track? Will another such slowdown happen again anytime in the foreseeable future?”

To understand that, we have to remind ourselves of what has happened over the past couple of years:

In 2004

In 2004, the system ran along lines that were quite sustainable, in terms of functionality –

No one could purchase Digots with DXDA or AB funds. In order to purchase more Digots, you had to get money in through the IB (work the full loop, in cases where you intend to leverage to improve your TDV). Aside from that, you could always purchase more shares from EOS Credits (RB additions). Most folks worked hard to get their cash around to the IB.

OA/DXD fees HAD to be paid from the IB. Yes, it was possible to pay your fees from AB, but if you did, then you were charged up to 22% in fees! Since you would not be earning as much during each month, or only slightly more, then you did not want to choose that option. Everyone was put in a position to need to get money around to the IB, and therefore, everyone worked very hard to get the cash moved through the system.

Again, the realization was that we never saw ‘the exact same dollars back’ which we put into the system in the first place. Everyone realized that the way it really worked was to understand that this is what was happening:

‘I’m going to help you get your money around the system to pay your fees, and you help me do the same.’ In other words: ‘I will pay your fees, and you will pay mine.’

Of course, the big picture view is more accurate: ‘I will pay Bob’s fees. He will pay Mary’s fees. Mary will pay Tom’s fees… on and on… and [he/she] will pay my fees.’

And we will make sure everyone is covered along the way, EACH MONTH. For the benefit of us all.

Finally, there was a high ratio of DXM’s to DXUsers. That meant that there were simply more points interacting at the same time to get the job done faster. Though more DXM’s are not theoretically necessary for smooth operations, having more certainly helps!

2004 was a ‘we work together’ year, in that sense. Those standards worked incredibly well. DXInOne, functionally, was set up in such a way that we were required to work together for the benefit of all, and this was quite useful.

In 2005

In 2005, however, we saw DXInOne make a massive transition. DXConsoles were closed down to new entrants. Everyone could purchase more Digots from DXDA or AB, directly (DXG to DXG cycles, heedless of the amount of e-currency/currency reserves needed to keep up with the increased DXG production).

We have gone over the reasons for the cutback to DXConsoles, and the reasons for why the system allowed DXG to DXG cycles in other topics; we won’t repeat them here.

Instead, realize this: the 2005 model was unsustainable, and most DXUsers knew it. It only existed because DXInOne needed to make the transitions they did. DXInOne was not concerned with OutXchange speeds, because again, DXInOne is not to a point where OutXchange processing is a priority issue.

Since then, we have clearly not kept up with the marketing needed to continue allowing us the leverage they had, and so after giving us every chance to improve the way we did things (we were shown that we needed to pay from IB; the TDV Reduction Tool was dropped, the EOS gains were cut back to barely anything; paying from standard OA meant that you no longer accrued DXDA, etc.) … finally, after none of the changes seemed to make us operate as we should, DXInOne cut back on the 2005 standards.

And now, just recently, something ELSE has happened:

There have been more changes to the way things operate at DXInOne. But these are not any ‘ordinary’ changes, such as the many that have come before.

Earlier changes were smaller; less significant as they arose. That is to say, there were ‘incremental fees’ added. There was a 30-day phasing out of the ability to withdraw DXDA to RB. The DXDU/TDV ratio was introduced: another ‘small step’ change.

DXInOne knew well that many who had gotten involved were not going to understand where the system was going if the changes that NEEDED to be made were put into place ALL OF A SUDDEN.

So, DXInOne focused on incremental changes, trying to shepherd everyone along. This ‘slow, incremental changes mode’ was possible for one main reason: DXInOne was not ready to launch anyway. They could let us be ‘amateurish’ about the way we handled our accounts. They could let us make mistakes, try to straighten out, get it wrong, etc… which is good for the reason that it DOES teach us to think about the system as the middle-men we need to become for it!

BUT, lately, the changes have just started to get BIG, SUDDEN, and STRICT.

What is happening?

DXInOne is getting very close to a full DXSystem release! I For that to happen, we have to quit being ‘amateurish’ market makers, and start acting like a competitive system!

To put it another way, DXInOne is saying ‘ok; it’s time to quit dabbling. We have given as much leverage as possible for as long

OA/DXD fees HAD to be paid from the IB. Yes, it was possible to pay your fees from AB, but if you did, then you were charged up to 22% in fees! Since you would not be earning as much during each month, or only slightly more, then you did not want to choose that option. Everyone was put in a position to need to get money around to the IB, and therefore, everyone worked very hard to get the cash moved through the system.

Again, the realization was that we never saw ‘the exact same dollars back’ which we put into the system in the first place. Everyone realized that the way it really worked was to understand that this is what was happening:

‘I’m going to help you get your money around the system to pay your fees, and you help me do the same.’ In other words: ‘I will pay your fees, and you will pay mine.’

Of course, the big picture view is more accurate: ‘I will pay Bob’s fees. He will pay Mary’s fees. Mary will pay Tom’s fees… on and on… and [he/she] will pay my fees.’

And we will make sure everyone is covered along the way, EACH MONTH. For the benefit of us all.

Finally, there was a high ratio of DXM’s to DXUsers. That meant that there were simply more points interacting at the same time to get the job done faster. Though more DXM’s are not theoretically necessary for smooth operations, having more certainly helps!

2004 was a ‘we work together’ year, in that sense. Those standards worked incredibly well. DXInOne, functionally, was set up in such a way that we were required to work together for the benefit of all, and this was quite useful.

In 2005

In 2005, however, we saw DXInOne make a massive transition. DXConsoles were closed down to new entrants. Everyone could purchase more Digots from DXDA or AB, directly (DXG to DXG cycles, heedless of the amount of e-currency/currency reserves needed to keep up with the increased DXG production).

We have gone over the reasons for the cutback to DXConsoles, and the reasons for why the system allowed DXG to DXG cycles in other topics; we won’t repeat them here.

Instead, realize this: the 2005 model was unsustainable, and most DXUsers knew it. It only existed because DXInOne needed to make the transitions they did. DXInOne was not concerned with OutXchange speeds, because again, DXInOne is not to a point where OutXchange processing is a priority issue.

Since then, we have clearly not kept up with the marketing needed to continue allowing us the leverage they had, and so after giving us every chance to improve the way we did things (we were shown that we needed to pay from IB; the TDV Reduction Tool was dropped, the EOS gains were cut back to barely anything; paying from standard OA meant that you no longer accrued DXDA, etc.) … finally, after none of the changes seemed to make us operate as we should, DXInOne cut back on the 2005 standards.

And now, just recently, something ELSE has happened:

There have been more changes to the way things operate at DXInOne. But these are not any ‘ordinary’ changes, such as the many that have come before.

Earlier changes were smaller; less significant as they arose. That is to say, there were ‘incremental fees’ added. There was a 30-day phasing out of the ability to withdraw DXDA to RB. The DXDU/TDV ratio was introduced: another ‘small step’ change.

DXInOne knew well that many who had gotten involved were not going to understand where the system was going if the changes that NEEDED to be made were put into place ALL OF A SUDDEN.

So, DXInOne focused on incremental changes, trying to shepherd everyone along. This ‘slow, incremental changes mode’ was possible for one main reason: DXInOne was not ready to launch anyway. They could let us be ‘amateurish’ about the way we handled our accounts. They could let us make mistakes, try to straighten out, get it wrong, etc… which is good for the reason that it DOES teach us to think about the system as the middle-men we need to become for it!

BUT, lately, the changes have just started to get BIG, SUDDEN, and STRICT.

What is happening?

DXInOne is getting very close to a full DXSystem release! I For that to happen, we have to quit being ‘amateurish’ market makers, and start acting like a competitive system!

To put it another way, DXInOne is saying ‘ok; it’s time to quit dabbling. We have given as much leverage as possible for as long

And we will make sure everyone is covered along the way, EACH MONTH. For the benefit of us all.

Finally, there was a high ratio of DXM’s to DXUsers. That meant that there were simply more points interacting at the same time to get the job done faster. Though more DXM’s are not theoretically necessary for smooth operations, having more certainly helps!

2004 was a ‘we work together’ year, in that sense. Those standards worked incredibly well. DXInOne, functionally, was set up in such a way that we were required to work together for the benefit of all, and this was quite useful.

In 2005

In 2005, however, we saw DXInOne make a massive transition. DXConsoles were closed down to new entrants. Everyone could purchase more Digots from DXDA or AB, directly (DXG to DXG cycles, heedless of the amount of e-currency/currency reserves needed to keep up with the increased DXG production).

We have gone over the reasons for the cutback to DXConsoles, and the reasons for why the system allowed DXG to DXG cycles in other topics; we won’t repeat them here.

Instead, realize this: the 2005 model was unsustainable, and most DXUsers knew it. It only existed because DXInOne needed to make the transitions they did. DXInOne was not concerned with OutXchange speeds, because again, DXInOne is not to a point where OutXchange processing is a priority issue.

Since then, we have clearly not kept up with the marketing needed to continue allowing us the leverage they had, and so after giving us every chance to improve the way we did things (we were shown that we needed to pay from IB; the TDV Reduction Tool was dropped, the EOS gains were cut back to barely anything; paying from standard OA meant that you no longer accrued DXDA, etc.) … finally, after none of the changes seemed to make us operate as we should, DXInOne cut back on the 2005 standards.

And now, just recently, something ELSE has happened:

There have been more changes to the way things operate at DXInOne. But these are not any ‘ordinary’ changes, such as the many that have come before.

Earlier changes were smaller; less significant as they arose. That is to say, there were ‘incremental fees’ added. There was a 30-day phasing out of the ability to withdraw DXDA to RB. The DXDU/TDV ratio was introduced: another ‘small step’ change.

DXInOne knew well that many who had gotten involved were not going to understand where the system was going if the changes that NEEDED to be made were put into place ALL OF A SUDDEN.

So, DXInOne focused on incremental changes, trying to shepherd everyone along. This ‘slow, incremental changes mode’ was possible for one main reason: DXInOne was not ready to launch anyway. They could let us be ‘amateurish’ about the way we handled our accounts. They could let us make mistakes, try to straighten out, get it wrong, etc… which is good for the reason that it DOES teach us to think about the system as the middle-men we need to become for it!

BUT, lately, the changes have just started to get BIG, SUDDEN, and STRICT.

What is happening?

DXInOne is getting very close to a full DXSystem release! I For that to happen, we have to quit being ‘amateurish’ market makers, and start acting like a competitive system!

To put it another way, DXInOne is saying ‘ok; it’s time to quit dabbling. We have given as much leverage as possible for as long

Instead, realize this: the 2005 model was unsustainable, and most DXUsers knew it. It only existed because DXInOne needed to make the transitions they did. DXInOne was not concerned with OutXchange speeds, because again, DXInOne is not to a point where OutXchange processing is a priority issue.

Since then, we have clearly not kept up with the marketing needed to continue allowing us the leverage they had, and so after giving us every chance to improve the way we did things (we were shown that we needed to pay from IB; the TDV Reduction Tool was dropped, the EOS gains were cut back to barely anything; paying from standard OA meant that you no longer accrued DXDA, etc.) … finally, after none of the changes seemed to make us operate as we should, DXInOne cut back on the 2005 standards.

And now, just recently, something ELSE has happened:

There have been more changes to the way things operate at DXInOne. But these are not any ‘ordinary’ changes, such as the many that have come before.

Earlier changes were smaller; less significant as they arose. That is to say, there were ‘incremental fees’ added. There was a 30-day phasing out of the ability to withdraw DXDA to RB. The DXDU/TDV ratio was introduced: another ‘small step’ change.

DXInOne knew well that many who had gotten involved were not going to understand where the system was going if the changes that NEEDED to be made were put into place ALL OF A SUDDEN.

So, DXInOne focused on incremental changes, trying to shepherd everyone along. This ‘slow, incremental changes mode’ was possible for one main reason: DXInOne was not ready to launch anyway. They could let us be ‘amateurish’ about the way we handled our accounts. They could let us make mistakes, try to straighten out, get it wrong, etc… which is good for the reason that it DOES teach us to think about the system as the middle-men we need to become for it!

BUT, lately, the changes have just started to get BIG, SUDDEN, and STRICT.

What is happening?

DXInOne is getting very close to a full DXSystem release! I For that to happen, we have to quit being ‘amateurish’ market makers, and start acting like a competitive system!

To put it another way, DXInOne is saying ‘ok; it’s time to quit dabbling. We have given as much leverage as possible for as long

DXInOne knew well that many who had gotten involved were not going to understand where the system was going if the changes that NEEDED to be made were put into place ALL OF A SUDDEN.

So, DXInOne focused on incremental changes, trying to shepherd everyone along. This ‘slow, incremental changes mode’ was possible for one main reason: DXInOne was not ready to launch anyway. They could let us be ‘amateurish’ about the way we handled our accounts. They could let us make mistakes, try to straighten out, get it wrong, etc… which is good for the reason that it DOES teach us to think about the system as the middle-men we need to become for it!

BUT, lately, the changes have just started to get BIG, SUDDEN, and STRICT.

What is happening?

DXInOne is getting very close to a full DXSystem release! I For that to happen, we have to quit being ‘amateurish’ market makers, and start acting like a competitive system!

To put it another way, DXInOne is saying ‘ok; it’s time to quit dabbling. We have given as much leverage as possible for as long as we could, but now that we are nearing ACTUAL DXService releases, we need everyone to ACTUALLY return the system to a fluid state by doing the job of paying DXP fees from IB, and attending to solid marketing, MIXED WITH QUALITY TRAINING.’

Those who don’t choose to pay from IB will simply not receive more DXG into circulation (DXDebit) until they get back around to paying from IB. That means understanding GOOD DXPORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT, which is something we have been going over in excellent detail in our EBooks (about 5 hours of audio/video DXPortfolio management training).

Also, those who are NOT paying from IB will be forced to pay from standard OA, which means that they are still earning (EOS Credits), but those additional earnings are ‘held behind the fence’, until that person pays the IB fee necessary to release those earnings into circulation.

So, the wonderful part is that it doesn’t matter at all just how many folks start doing the job they should (stay active). Let us say that only 5 do!

The back-log of money in AB will simply lessen, as money in AB is used to help pay for DXPortfolio fees (at standard). What that effectively means is that ‘money earned during each month will have to be taken back out of circulation again if folks are not paying from IB.’

What does that leave left?

All the DXG in circulation belongs only to those DXUsers who are paying their OA/DXD fees from IB!

So if only 5 members are active each month, then there will only be OutXchanges for those 5 persons to contend with! That is, of course, a very easy back-log to deal with.

The system will suddenly speed up. And that means that it will be very easy to find others to join and get going as they should (as long as they have quality training). The point to make is that it does not functionally matter much whether there are only 5 market-makers operating in this system or 50,000. The system can be fast either way, as long as everyone has to follow the same relative standards each month to maintain, constantly, the DXPortfolios they choose to hold and earn withdrawable values from.

What is being managed, finally, is this: the DXG in circulation is only slightly higher than the hard reserves being added to the system during any months.

For those who earn and wish to remove some of those reserves (cashing out), they cannot KEEP EARNING unless they at least return a minimal amount of reserves (pay fees from IB) to the system each month.

Obviously, that can cover for a lot of the DXG listed for OutXchanges. What is LEFT to be covered is easily taken care of by the marketing that will naturally follow.

Sustainable, Growing Reserves Base!

So what we see here is a sustainable, growing reserves base, just like all competitive market makers: DXG being earned slowly, and us having to ensure reserves contribution to enough of a degree to grow with it – remember, it’s our job to be the market makers, and those who fund them (users without DXConsoles). The reason we’re paid bonuses is to give us a reason to get more funds involved… it’s all about market expansion.

The rest of the money required to continue growing the reserves (to maintain freshly-earned DXG) comes from marketing, which is only a few % market expansion demand MONTHLY.

That is maintainable. It is, in effect, a return to 2004 standards, though with a ‘twist’: the addition of value-added services! As we make the system fluid, folks can appear out of anywhere, drawing new funding through the system, but there has to be a reason for them to get involved, and that is what the DXServices will finally make possible.

So far… we have focused on getting BACK to balance, so that what we are working with is fluid. In the next issue, we will get very directly involved with MORE. That is, where things are going broadly, and how to perceive where the gains will be coming from.

Remember, DXInOne fully expects that being able to cash out $20,000 monthly via OutXchanges will not be at all difficult when the DXSystem is finalized.