Tags |
|
|
Links |
|
|
Add You - Pros and Cons of Six Sigma
While visiting the very cool Which Wich? sandwich store in downtown Dallas, founder Jeff Sinelli was relaying a story to me about trying to return something to a vendor. It was the vendor’s policy not to allow returns. This forced Jeff to call someone and arrange reimbursement. This situation made me wonder: How many policies do other QSRs have in place that inconveniences the guests?Prior to writing this article, I visited a very large QSR chain for breakfast. Signs were posted on each register, “Sauce Policy” and “Salad Dressing Policy.” The sign titles interested me so I decided to read on.The Sauce Policy clearly stated how many dipping sauces you received based on the number of pieces of chicken nuggets/tender
• Six Sigma can easily digress into a bureaucratic exercise, if the focus is on such things as the number of trained Black Belts and Green Belts, number of projects completed, etc. instead of bottom line savings.
• There is an overselling of Six Sigma by too many consulting firms. Many of them claim expertise in Six Sigma when they barely understand the tools, techniques and the Six Sigma roadmap.
• The relationship between Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and Process Sigma Quality Level requires more justification.
What does the future hold for Six Sigma?
In my opinion, Six Sigma will be around as long as the projects yield measurable or quantifiable bottom-line results in monetary or financial terms…when Six Sigma projects stop yielding bottom-line results, it might disappear.
One of the real dangers of Six Sigma is to do with the capability of Black Belts (the so called technical experts) who tackle challenging projects in or
In today’s competitive market, the ones that outlast and survive are those that can do more things and programs with lesser resources. This is why increasingly, we are seeing companies’ budget requiring a reduction in overheads and capital expenditures, whilst profits and revenues are expected to increase. Companies have little choice as the marketplace, the shareholders and the investors dictate this. As with eating, in company less corporate fats really does mean more.Carl von Clausewitz, a nineteenth-century Austrian officer who fought in the Napoleonic wars and is regarded as the ‘father’ of western military strategic thought, wrote in his classic book On War: “War is not the action of a living force upon lifel
Six Sigma is a business strategy that seeks to identify and eliminate causes of errors, defects or failures in business processes by focusing on outputs that are critical to customers. It is a measure of quality that strives for the near elimination of defects by using the application of statistical methods. A defect is defined as anything which could lead to customer dissatisfaction. The fundamental objective of the Six Sigma methodology is the implementation of a measurement-based strategy that focuses on process improvement and variation reduction.
When the Six Sigma approach was introduced to many organizations, the initial reactions included a lot of skepticism, such as:
• It is another quality improvement initiative or flavor of the month
• There is nothing really new in Six Sigma compared to other past quality initiatives
• This too shall pass like others
• It is an ‘old wine in a new bottle’
• This won’t work in our business
• We are doing Six Sigma already
• It is nothing more than a hype
• It is not for us as Six Sigma requires complicated statistical methods However, the following aspects of the Six Sigma approach were not accentuated in previous quality improvement initiatives:
• Six Sigma strategy places a clear focus on achieving measurable and quantifiable financial returns to the bottom-line of an organization. No Six Sigma project is approved unless the bottom-line impact has been clearly identified and defined.
• Six Sigma strategy places an unprecedented importance on strong, passionate leadership and the support required .for its successful deployment
• Six Sigma methodology of problem solving integrates the human elements (culture change, customer focus, belt system infrastructure, etc.) and process elements (process management, statistical analysis of process data, measurement system analysis, etc.) of improvement.
• The Six Sigma methodology utilizes the tools and techniques for fixing problems in business processes in a sequential and disciplined fashion. Each tool and technique within the Six Sigma methodology has a role to play and when, where, why and how these tools or techniques should be applied is the difference between success and failure of a Six Sigma project.
• Six Sigma emphasizes the importance of data and decision making based on facts, rather than assumptions and hunches! Six Sigma forces people to put measurements in place. Measurement is considered as a part of the culture change…What gets measured, gets done!! Just like any other quality improvement initiative we have seen in the past, Six Sigma has its own limitations. The following are some of the limitations of the Six Sigma approach, creating future opportunities for research:
• The challenge of having access to quality data, especially in processes where no data is available to begin with (sometimes this task could take the largest proportion of the project time)
• The right selection and prioritization of projects is one of the critical success factors of a Six Sigma program. The prioritization of projects in many organizations is still purely subjective. Very few tools exist for prioritizing projects and this should be the major thrust for future research.
• The statistical definition of Six Sigma is 3.4 defects or failures per million opportunities. In service processes, a defect may be defined as anything which does not meet customer needs or expectations. However, it would be illogical to assume that all defects are equally bad. For instance, a defect in a hospital could be a wrong admission procedure, misdiagnosis, misbehavior of staff members, unwillingness to help patients when they have specific queries, etc. Assumption of 1.5 sigma shift (standard improvement) for all business processes does not make much sense. This particular issue should be dealt with extra caution as a small shift in sigma could lead to erroneous defect calculations.
• Six Sigma can easily digress into a bureaucratic exercise, if the focus is on such things as the number of trained Black Belts and Green Belts, number of projects completed, etc. instead of bottom line savings.
• There is an overselling of Six Sigma by too many consulting firms. Many of them claim expertise in Six Sigma when they barely understand the tools, techniques and the Six Sigma roadmap.
• The relationship between Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and Process Sigma Quality Level requires more justification.
What does the future hold for Six Sigma?
In my opinion, Six Sigma will be around as long as the projects yield measurable or quantifiable bottom-line results in monetary or financial terms…when Six Sigma projects stop yielding bottom-line results, it might disappear.
One of the real dangers of Six Sigma is to do with the capability of Black Belts (the so called technical experts) who tackle challenging projects in org
There is, understandably, a never-ending push in the health care industry to improve quality, performance, and the overall patient experience. To continually evolve and improve, hospitals and larger medical facilities utilize a wide array of tools in performing self assessments and benchmarking – one of which is the patient satisfaction survey. Smaller practices, consisting of even just one or two providers, can benefit by following the lead of the major organizations as there is a wealth of information to be learned by listening to your patients.Regardless of the size of your practice, offering patients the opportunity to anonymously voice their concerns is an excellent way to obtain candid, honest feedback on your practice. Sa
• We are doing Six Sigma already
• It is nothing more than a hype
• It is not for us as Six Sigma requires complicated statistical methods However, the following aspects of the Six Sigma approach were not accentuated in previous quality improvement initiatives:
• Six Sigma strategy places a clear focus on achieving measurable and quantifiable financial returns to the bottom-line of an organization. No Six Sigma project is approved unless the bottom-line impact has been clearly identified and defined.
• Six Sigma strategy places an unprecedented importance on strong, passionate leadership and the support required .for its successful deployment
• Six Sigma methodology of problem solving integrates the human elements (culture change, customer focus, belt system infrastructure, etc.) and process elements (process management, statistical analysis of process data, measurement system analysis, etc.) of improvement.
• The Six Sigma methodology utilizes the tools and techniques for fixing problems in business processes in a sequential and disciplined fashion. Each tool and technique within the Six Sigma methodology has a role to play and when, where, why and how these tools or techniques should be applied is the difference between success and failure of a Six Sigma project.
• Six Sigma emphasizes the importance of data and decision making based on facts, rather than assumptions and hunches! Six Sigma forces people to put measurements in place. Measurement is considered as a part of the culture change…What gets measured, gets done!! Just like any other quality improvement initiative we have seen in the past, Six Sigma has its own limitations. The following are some of the limitations of the Six Sigma approach, creating future opportunities for research:
• The challenge of having access to quality data, especially in processes where no data is available to begin with (sometimes this task could take the largest proportion of the project time)
• The right selection and prioritization of projects is one of the critical success factors of a Six Sigma program. The prioritization of projects in many organizations is still purely subjective. Very few tools exist for prioritizing projects and this should be the major thrust for future research.
• The statistical definition of Six Sigma is 3.4 defects or failures per million opportunities. In service processes, a defect may be defined as anything which does not meet customer needs or expectations. However, it would be illogical to assume that all defects are equally bad. For instance, a defect in a hospital could be a wrong admission procedure, misdiagnosis, misbehavior of staff members, unwillingness to help patients when they have specific queries, etc. Assumption of 1.5 sigma shift (standard improvement) for all business processes does not make much sense. This particular issue should be dealt with extra caution as a small shift in sigma could lead to erroneous defect calculations.
• Six Sigma can easily digress into a bureaucratic exercise, if the focus is on such things as the number of trained Black Belts and Green Belts, number of projects completed, etc. instead of bottom line savings.
• There is an overselling of Six Sigma by too many consulting firms. Many of them claim expertise in Six Sigma when they barely understand the tools, techniques and the Six Sigma roadmap.
• The relationship between Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and Process Sigma Quality Level requires more justification.
What does the future hold for Six Sigma?
In my opinion, Six Sigma will be around as long as the projects yield measurable or quantifiable bottom-line results in monetary or financial terms…when Six Sigma projects stop yielding bottom-line results, it might disappear.
One of the real dangers of Six Sigma is to do with the capability of Black Belts (the so called technical experts) who tackle challenging projects in or
“99% of advertising doesn’t sell a thing.”Sounds like something a local real estate agent might say after paying for yet another ad that didn’t produce, right?You might be surprised to learn that the quote actually belongs to David Ogilvy, legendary founder of one of the world’s largest and most successful advertising agencies.Yikes – if a man regarded as a giant in the ad industry is so negative about advertising’s success rate, how should you feel?The Bad News is the Good News…There is an upside here. If so much of the advertising in your local market is ineffective, you can gain a significant edge on your competition by having a better local advertising strategy than other agents.A
• Six Sigma emphasizes the importance of data and decision making based on facts, rather than assumptions and hunches! Six Sigma forces people to put measurements in place. Measurement is considered as a part of the culture change…What gets measured, gets done!! Just like any other quality improvement initiative we have seen in the past, Six Sigma has its own limitations. The following are some of the limitations of the Six Sigma approach, creating future opportunities for research:
• The challenge of having access to quality data, especially in processes where no data is available to begin with (sometimes this task could take the largest proportion of the project time)
• The right selection and prioritization of projects is one of the critical success factors of a Six Sigma program. The prioritization of projects in many organizations is still purely subjective. Very few tools exist for prioritizing projects and this should be the major thrust for future research.
• The statistical definition of Six Sigma is 3.4 defects or failures per million opportunities. In service processes, a defect may be defined as anything which does not meet customer needs or expectations. However, it would be illogical to assume that all defects are equally bad. For instance, a defect in a hospital could be a wrong admission procedure, misdiagnosis, misbehavior of staff members, unwillingness to help patients when they have specific queries, etc. Assumption of 1.5 sigma shift (standard improvement) for all business processes does not make much sense. This particular issue should be dealt with extra caution as a small shift in sigma could lead to erroneous defect calculations.
• Six Sigma can easily digress into a bureaucratic exercise, if the focus is on such things as the number of trained Black Belts and Green Belts, number of projects completed, etc. instead of bottom line savings.
• There is an overselling of Six Sigma by too many consulting firms. Many of them claim expertise in Six Sigma when they barely understand the tools, techniques and the Six Sigma roadmap.
• The relationship between Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and Process Sigma Quality Level requires more justification.
What does the future hold for Six Sigma?
In my opinion, Six Sigma will be around as long as the projects yield measurable or quantifiable bottom-line results in monetary or financial terms…when Six Sigma projects stop yielding bottom-line results, it might disappear.
One of the real dangers of Six Sigma is to do with the capability of Black Belts (the so called technical experts) who tackle challenging projects in or
Cinema advertising has always been an effective marketing tool for some advertisers, while for others they have yet to see the benefit of this unique form of media. When an advertiser hears the term “Cinema Advertising” automatically they think the slide that is shown on the big screen with the soothing music played in the background.For many years that is exactly what it’s been but companies like the National Cinema Network and Regal Entertainment along with new technology have changed the scope of how cinema advertising is perceived. At many theatres you can actually have a total digital experience from the time you buy your tickets to the time that you sit in your seat. With LCD screens in the theater lobby and digital advert
• The right selection and prioritization of projects is one of the critical success factors of a Six Sigma program. The prioritization of projects in many organizations is still purely subjective. Very few tools exist for prioritizing projects and this should be the major thrust for future research.
• The statistical definition of Six Sigma is 3.4 defects or failures per million opportunities. In service processes, a defect may be defined as anything which does not meet customer needs or expectations. However, it would be illogical to assume that all defects are equally bad. For instance, a defect in a hospital could be a wrong admission procedure, misdiagnosis, misbehavior of staff members, unwillingness to help patients when they have specific queries, etc. Assumption of 1.5 sigma shift (standard improvement) for all business processes does not make much sense. This particular issue should be dealt with extra caution as a small shift in sigma could lead to erroneous defect calculations.
• Six Sigma can easily digress into a bureaucratic exercise, if the focus is on such things as the number of trained Black Belts and Green Belts, number of projects completed, etc. instead of bottom line savings.
• There is an overselling of Six Sigma by too many consulting firms. Many of them claim expertise in Six Sigma when they barely understand the tools, techniques and the Six Sigma roadmap.
• The relationship between Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and Process Sigma Quality Level requires more justification.
What does the future hold for Six Sigma?
In my opinion, Six Sigma will be around as long as the projects yield measurable or quantifiable bottom-line results in monetary or financial terms…when Six Sigma projects stop yielding bottom-line results, it might disappear.
One of the real dangers of Six Sigma is to do with the capability of Black Belts (the so called technical experts) who tackle challenging projects in or
The price of a newspaper would be beyond the reach of the average wage earner if it were not for advertising. The major portion of production costs is covered by the fee charged for advertising, thus making newspapers affordable to the public.The cost of advertising is alarmingly high but the charge varies according to the publications circulation figures, its size and the complexity of the advertisment.Every newspaper carries a smalls section, so called because the adverts in this section are very short and to the point. The smalls columns are also known as classified adverts because the items advertised are grouped into classes. An alphabetical index is included at the start of the section to help you find the advert ea
• Six Sigma can easily digress into a bureaucratic exercise, if the focus is on such things as the number of trained Black Belts and Green Belts, number of projects completed, etc. instead of bottom line savings.
• There is an overselling of Six Sigma by too many consulting firms. Many of them claim expertise in Six Sigma when they barely understand the tools, techniques and the Six Sigma roadmap.
• The relationship between Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) and Process Sigma Quality Level requires more justification.
What does the future hold for Six Sigma?
In my opinion, Six Sigma will be around as long as the projects yield measurable or quantifiable bottom-line results in monetary or financial terms…when Six Sigma projects stop yielding bottom-line results, it might disappear.
One of the real dangers of Six Sigma is to do with the capability of Black Belts (the so called technical experts) who tackle challenging projects in organizations. We cannot simply assume that all Black Belts are equally good. Another danger is the attitude of many senior managers in organizations that Six Sigma is “an instant pudding’, solving all their ever-lasting problems. I would like to accentuate the point that Six Sigma does provide an effective means for deploying and implementing measurement based thinking based on the following three rudimentary principles:
• All work occurs in a system of interconnected processes
• Variation exists in all processes, and
• The Variation in processes can be measured and controlled
The above principles of statistical thinking within Six Sigma are robust and it is fair to assume that Six Sigma will continue to grow in the next few years. However the total package may change in the evolutionary process and Six Sigma will probably be supplanted by a new business management approach in the near future.
HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.addyou.info/article/22211/addyou-Pros-and-Cons-of-Six-Sigma.html">Pros and Cons of Six Sigma</a>
BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.addyou.info/article/22211/addyou-Pros-and-Cons-of-Six-Sigma.html]Pros and Cons of Six Sigma[/url]
Related Articles:
6 Ways to Improve Customer Service
What Leaders Can Learn From Camp Counselors
Bookmark it:
|