ieve that..." or if you use large parts of their arguments; you might simply say state the person, article, organization, publication of where you read what and basically what "IT" is.

Now then, I warn online

Online Article Authors and Article Marketers should not lower their standards into the realm of re-writing articles or brush the boundaries of plagiarism. But how does one write a rebuttal article for debate without re-writing their original article’s basic premise?

One thing I have found myself doing is finding an obscure article somewhere about an important subject that I completely disagreed with and feel compelled to write a rebuttal and in this case I find myself re-stating their premise of their article in mine so that my commentary makes sense, as I debate their arguments.

Thus in a way you are re-writing their arguments as you crush the ever-living crap out of them into oblivion. Of course it is all in how you do it that makes sense and it is appropriate to make mention of it. Such as "Some Say", "Many Believe" or "Socialists Believe that..." or if you use large parts of their arguments; you might simply say state the person, article, organization, publication of where you read what and basically what "IT" is.

Now then, I warn online a

re-writing their original article’s basic premise?

One thing I have found myself doing is finding an obscure article somewhere about an important subject that I completely disagreed with and feel compelled to write a rebuttal and in this case I find myself re-stating their premise of their article in mine so that my commentary makes sense, as I debate their arguments.

Thus in a way you are re-writing their arguments as you crush the ever-living crap out of them into oblivion. Of course it is all in how you do it that makes sense and it is appropriate to make mention of it. Such as "Some Say", "Many Believe" or "Socialists Believe that..." or if you use large parts of their arguments; you might simply say state the person, article, organization, publication of where you read what and basically what "IT" is.

Now then, I warn online

write a rebuttal and in this case I find myself re-stating their premise of their article in mine so that my commentary makes sense, as I debate their arguments.

Thus in a way you are re-writing their arguments as you crush the ever-living crap out of them into oblivion. Of course it is all in how you do it that makes sense and it is appropriate to make mention of it. Such as "Some Say", "Many Believe" or "Socialists Believe that..." or if you use large parts of their arguments; you might simply say state the person, article, organization, publication of where you read what and basically what "IT" is.

Now then, I warn online

s as you crush the ever-living crap out of them into oblivion. Of course it is all in how you do it that makes sense and it is appropriate to make mention of it. Such as "Some Say", "Many Believe" or "Socialists Believe that..." or if you use large parts of their arguments; you might simply say state the person, article, organization, publication of where you read what and basically what "IT" is.

Now then, I warn online

ieve that..." or if you use large parts of their arguments; you might simply say state the person, article, organization, publication of where you read what and basically what "IT" is.

Now then, I warn online article authors who re-write articles that it is a slippery slope to outright plagiarism and that you should not go there. It is essential that you understand this because there is just too much web content out there that has been lifted, stolen or plagiarized. Perhaps this article will propel thought in 2007 and help you in your quest to be the best.