e sense from a longevity standpoint or hybrids using multiple strategy approach. I would recommend "Good to Great" and "Built to Last" I do think Stanford Professor Collins makes some sense of it all.

If our system rewards cheaters then of course cheaters we shall find. If our SEC, NASD and other regulatory wat

Many people believe that the Public Mega Corporations are eventually doomed to fail and of course there are many reasons for this. One of the most common reasons cited by media is Corporate Malfeasance. Another one which some free-market economists note is that the Stock Market is now a gambling casino and still others make light of the fact that corporate greed from those at the top is out of control. Of course someone once said something interesting about Absolute Power.

If any of these comments strike you as interesting topics or you think that any of these points are indeed valid then many might agree with you. You might also like to read Warren Buffets, essays on Corporate Governance sometime, very insightful indeed.

A Corporation must keep growing in order to maintain ever increasing profits and as a company grows it too must provide increased shareholders equity and quarterly profits, but it cannot grow forever, due to laws of bureaucracy and in the end only one company would be left right? Kind of like the Banking industry in England.

Of course in our economy we have 10s of thousands of companies and the Russell 1000 is slammed with mega-corporations, some run efficiently some cannot make their numbers. Thus spin-offs, closely net-centric groups, associations, franchises, dealer networks and such make more sense from a longevity standpoint or hybrids using multiple strategy approach. I would recommend "Good to Great" and "Built to Last" I do think Stanford Professor Collins makes some sense of it all.

If our system rewards cheaters then of course cheaters we shall find. If our SEC, NASD and other regulatory wat

fact that corporate greed from those at the top is out of control. Of course someone once said something interesting about Absolute Power.

If any of these comments strike you as interesting topics or you think that any of these points are indeed valid then many might agree with you. You might also like to read Warren Buffets, essays on Corporate Governance sometime, very insightful indeed.

A Corporation must keep growing in order to maintain ever increasing profits and as a company grows it too must provide increased shareholders equity and quarterly profits, but it cannot grow forever, due to laws of bureaucracy and in the end only one company would be left right? Kind of like the Banking industry in England.

Of course in our economy we have 10s of thousands of companies and the Russell 1000 is slammed with mega-corporations, some run efficiently some cannot make their numbers. Thus spin-offs, closely net-centric groups, associations, franchises, dealer networks and such make more sense from a longevity standpoint or hybrids using multiple strategy approach. I would recommend "Good to Great" and "Built to Last" I do think Stanford Professor Collins makes some sense of it all.

If our system rewards cheaters then of course cheaters we shall find. If our SEC, NASD and other regulatory wat

ays on Corporate Governance sometime, very insightful indeed.

A Corporation must keep growing in order to maintain ever increasing profits and as a company grows it too must provide increased shareholders equity and quarterly profits, but it cannot grow forever, due to laws of bureaucracy and in the end only one company would be left right? Kind of like the Banking industry in England.

Of course in our economy we have 10s of thousands of companies and the Russell 1000 is slammed with mega-corporations, some run efficiently some cannot make their numbers. Thus spin-offs, closely net-centric groups, associations, franchises, dealer networks and such make more sense from a longevity standpoint or hybrids using multiple strategy approach. I would recommend "Good to Great" and "Built to Last" I do think Stanford Professor Collins makes some sense of it all.

If our system rewards cheaters then of course cheaters we shall find. If our SEC, NASD and other regulatory wat

eft right? Kind of like the Banking industry in England.

Of course in our economy we have 10s of thousands of companies and the Russell 1000 is slammed with mega-corporations, some run efficiently some cannot make their numbers. Thus spin-offs, closely net-centric groups, associations, franchises, dealer networks and such make more sense from a longevity standpoint or hybrids using multiple strategy approach. I would recommend "Good to Great" and "Built to Last" I do think Stanford Professor Collins makes some sense of it all.

If our system rewards cheaters then of course cheaters we shall find. If our SEC, NASD and other regulatory wat

e sense from a longevity standpoint or hybrids using multiple strategy approach. I would recommend "Good to Great" and "Built to Last" I do think Stanford Professor Collins makes some sense of it all.

If our system rewards cheaters then of course cheaters we shall find. If our SEC, NASD and other regulatory watch systems make too many rules they create criminals and of course then the self-fulfilling prophesy predicts; criminals we shall find. It all adds to the sound and fury of the inevitable repeat and dooming of the players for the fans in the stands that watch between the playing of the bands.

I hope this article will make you think of the reality of the Publicly-Held Corporation and why some folks believe that such a structure cannot last forever. Personally, I like free-enterprise a lot more than communism.